Friday, 15 January 2010

is the fujifilm 3d camera any good? or should i get a lomo?

i heard mix reviews about the 3d camera and now im not sure whether i should get it. lomo seems more popular nowadays and i can get a holga at an affordable price

Best Answer

Interesting choices.

One is a Digital Camera that captures 3 dimensional images (difficult to view without a 3D viewer ($500)) and a primitive film camera with only one shutter speed and two apertures to choose exposures.

A LOMO camera costs under $60. The Funifilm 3D camera $600. That is a ten times difference.

There are many excellent alternatives in between.

If you want to shoot film, I would suggest you buy a good used 35 mm SLR with a standard zoom lens to start your adventure with photography. If you want a digital camera, you need to look here for your options. [URL Truncated]

Answer by fhotoace on 02 Jan 2010 11:40:24

Oh dear another person that wants to produce "art" why don't you spend the money on a proper camera and learn about photography?

Answer by CiaoChao on 02 Jan 2010 04:43:00

There's are two DIFFERENT choices. I know nothing about lomo, but I love 3-D and I would love to own that Fujifilm 3-D camera. Like Fotoace said, you'll need a special view to use it. That's disappointing considering how many other ways have been developed to view 3-D.

Back to the point, what do you want to do? For general photography, neither obviously. These are both niche products for special interests, just like time lapse cameras, infrared cameras, waterproof cameras, and all that.

Answer by water_skipper on 05 Jan 2010 03:46:29

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)